January 29, 2012
Changing the rules in the middle of the game: Philadelphia’s green infrastructure

Image001

Changing the rules in the middle of the game: Philadelphia’s green infrastructure

Category: Water
Posted on: January 18, 2012 4:14 PM, by
 Liz Borkowski

Aging US water infrastructure has meant more leaks, flooded basements, and massive sinkholes in cities across the US. Fixing the water and sewer systems in need of repair will take billions of dollars, and it’s hard to find that kind of money in the budget these days.

 

Saqib Rahim reports for ClimateWire on Philadelphia’s decision to use “green infrastructure” rather than building a larger pipe system to handle the water that’s dumped on the city during severe storms. The combination of more intense storms and more paved area is a problem: Impervious surfaces like roads, sidewalks, and parking lots can’t absorb rainfall, so it ends up in the city’s stormwater collection system — which, in many older cities, is combined with the sewage system. When these combined systems are overwhelmed by heavy rainfall, the result is often that a rainfall-and-sewage mixture gets discharged into a local waterway. (Read more about this problem here.) Rahim explains Philadelphia’s solution to this problem:

Instead of building an even larger pipe system to address the issue, [Water Department Commissioner Howard] Neukrug pitched the most aggressive “green infrastructure” plan in the country. Through increased vegetation, rain barrels, sponge-like roads and other measures, the city would try to absorb more water where it fell. The ground would filter out pollutants, reduce strain on the pipelines and make the city a more attractive place.

Neukrug tells Rahim that the green infrastructure solution will cost Philadelphia $2 billion, compared to $8 billion to $10 billion for larger underground tunnels. But the part of the city’s plan that’s currently causing a controversy is what water customers will pay. They’ll now be charged not just for the water they use, but for their contributions to stormwater problems — that is, sites with a lot of impervious surfaces will pay more.

The average household will see an average bill rise from approximately $60 to around $63.50, Rahim reports. For some large businesses, though, costs could rise significantly over the next few years — and 100 of these businesses have hired a lobbyist and met with the Water Department to oppose implementation of the new billing practices.

I can understand why these businesses are upset. When they invest and plan for their businesses’ futures, they assume the rules will stay the same. Their extensive impervious surfaces are causing problems for public health, but they might not have realized that their decisions about what to pave were raising costs for the city’s residents (and everyone else affected when its sewage ended up in local waterways).

Changing the rules isn’t ideal, but it’s the best solution if the current rules create incentives for behavior that harms public health. If this country had never changed the rules to make businesses start bearing more of the cost for problems they cause the general public (externalities, in economic language), we’d still have rivers so polluted that they catch fire. Governments can ease the pain by providing grants or low-interest loans to help businesses and individuals invest in greener setups — and, Rahim reports, Philadelphia is offering loans to businesses that want to green their facilities. Increases in bills will also be capped at 10% or $100 per month.

Such an approach could also be used to address other public health issues like CO2 emissions — but so far, opposition to a carbon tax has been stronger than support. In the meantime, I’ll be watching Philadelphia’s effort and hoping it succeeds with a green solution to water infrastructure challenges.

Source:  http://scienceblogs.com/thepumphandle/2012/01/changing_the_rules_in_the_midd.php#more

January 28, 2012
Example SWMM 5 Model for Activated Slude

Note:   Example SWMM 5 Model for Activated Sludge

 

Here is one example of how to model an activated sludge tank.  The image is Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activated_sludge)  and is the watermark background in the SWMM 5 GUI.  There is 100 lps inflow, 20 percent recycle and 10 percent sludge drawoff.   You can adjust the amount of recycle and sludge altering the pump type 2 flows or if you want to increase the inflows – add more flow in the RawWater inflow node.

 

Image001

 


1-28-2012_11-47-17_am
activated_sludge.inp Download this file

January 28, 2012
Three Flow Divider Link Example in SWMM 5

Image001

Subject:  Three Flow Divider Link Example in SWMM 5

 

You can have more than 2 downstream OUTLET Type links in the SWMM 5 dynamic wave solution.  Each link, Under5, Over5 and ReturnFlow is an OUTLET Link with a rating curve depth/flow table.  Depending on the depth in the storage node DIVIDER, the flow is computed from the table for links Under5, Over5 and ReturnFlow.

 

Image004

 

Image005


ReverseFlow.inp Download this file

January 28, 2012
Output Statstics Manager to find negative flows in InfoSWMM

Subject:  Output Statstics Manager to find negative flows in InfoSWMM

 

Output Statstics Manager to find negative flows with these parameters:

 

1.       Pipe Features

2.       Use a Domain with your force mains

3.       Select Flow

4.       Event Dependent

5.       Total – NOT Mean or Peak to  find the negative and positive flows

6.       Large NEGATIVE Flow Threshold

7.       Large NEGATIVE Volume Threshold

8.       Zero for Interevent Time to pick up all values

9.       You will get a table that shows you the minimun flows, and a histogram of the flows

 

 

Image002

 

Image003

 

Image007

 

 

January 28, 2012
Flow Dividers in SWMM 5 Dynamic Routing

Image001

Note:  Flow Dividers in SWMM 5 Dynamic Routing

 

You can  have flow dividers in SWMM 5 dynamic routing by using Storage Nodes for the dividers, OUTLET links for the downstream links and minimizing downstream HGL effects. The needed components are:

 

1.   A Storage Node for the divider node as a OUTLET Link does not have a Surface Area,

2.   Two or More OUTLET Links as the downstream diversion and cutoff links,

3.   Two or More Rating Curves to divide the flow up based on either depth or head,

4.   Pumps, Outfalls or Steep Sloped Links Downstream of the diversion and cutoff links to minimize downstream HGL  effects

 

Image002


dividers_in_dynamic_wave.inp Download this file

January 24, 2012
Keep and Dampen options and their effect on the four main terms of the St Venant equation

Note:  The Keep and Dampen options and their effect on the four main terms of the St Venant equation. 

 

The four terms are are used in the new flow for a time step of Qnew:

 

Qnew = (Qold – dq2 + dq3 + dq4) / ( 1 + dq1)

when the force main or gravity main is full dq3 and dq4 are zero and  Qnew = (Qold – dq2) / ( 1 + dq1)

 

The dq4 term in dynamic.c uses the area upstream (a1) and area downstream (a2), the midpoint velocity, the sigma factor (a function of the link Froude number), the link length and the time step or

dq4 = Time Step * Velocity * Velocity * (a2 – a1) / Link Length * Sigma

where Sigma is a function of the Froude Number and the Keep, Dampen and Ignore Inertial Term Options.  Keep sets Sigma to 1 always and Dampen set Sigma based on the Froude number, Ignore sets Sigma to 0 all  of the time during the simulation

 

the dq3 term in dynamic.c uses the current midpoint area (a function of the midpoint depth), the sigma factor and the midpoint velocity.

 

dq3 = 2 * Velocity * ( Amid(current iteration) – Amid (last time step) * Sigma

dq1 = Time Step * RoughFactor / Rwtd^1.333 * |Velocity|

 

The weighted area (Awtd) is used in the dq2 term of the St. Venant equation:

dq2 = Time Step * Awtd * (Head Downstream – Head Upstream) / Link Length or

dq2 = Time Step * Awtd * (Head Downstream – Head Upstream) / Link Length

 

Normally, dq1 (Friction Loss / Maroon in the Graph) balances dq2 (Water Surface Slope Term or Green in the Graph) but often for links with a large difference between upstream and  downstream depths dq4 (Red in the Graph) can have a significant value.  If dq4 or dq3 are important then the depth of water to increases to pass the same flow using the Keep option over the Ignore.   If you have a link with a Froude number near or over 1.0 (Supercritical) then using Keep or Dampen  for the Options may result in depth differences.   The effect of Keep is to increase the “loss” terms in the St Venant Equation.   The effect of Dampen and Ignore is to decrease the sum of the “loss” terms in the St. Venant Solution and lower the simulated depth.

 

Image003

January 19, 2012
Rooftop gardens could solve Singapore’s flooding problem

Rooftop gardens could solve Singapore’s flooding problem

By Tyler Falk | January 18, 2012, 9:09 AM PST

From SmartPlanet

In the last two years, rapid urbanization and changing weather patterns have lead to major flash floods in Singapore.

“[It] can be safely presumed that the weather patterns in Singapore have changed,” said Singapore’s Minister for the Environment and Water Resources last year after a flash flood where in one day Singapore received 77 percent of the amount of rainfall that usually falls in June. “It is very likely that our drainage systems will have to be redesigned to cope with such intense flashes.”

Singapore convened a panel to come up with the best options for dealing with flash floods and stormwater runoff. Their suggestion? Not an overhaul of the drainage system, but rooftop gardens.

Big infrastructure projects are costly and take time to replace. And while the upgrading the drainage system is likely necessary, the panel suggests a quick fix to Singapore: require rooftop gardens on all new and retrofitted buildings. Rooftop gardens don’t just add beauty to the city, they can also play a big role in mitigating floods by reducing and slowing stormwater runoff and filtering pollutants.

But it’s not just rooftop gardens, Singapore’s Today reports:

These measures are to be complemented with diversion canals, storage tanks along “pathways” of drains, drain capacity improvements, and finally, flood barriers, raised platform levels - some of which is already being done, but “could be carried further”, noted Prof Balmforth.

The panel also suggested storage tanks, rain gardens, and porous pavement.

Photo: HenryLeongHimWoh

/Flickr

Urbanisation has led to increase in storm water run-off: Expert panel [Today]

 


Image001

January 17, 2012
Innovyze Surge Line Brings Surge Events to Life With Cutting-Edge Pipe Profile Animations

Innovyze Surge Line Brings Surge Events to Life With Cutting-Edge Pipe Profile Animations 

High Quality Animation Gives Engineers Inside View of Model Activities for the First Time

 

Broomfield, Colorado USA, January 17, 2011 — Innovyze, a leading global innovator of business analytics software and technologies for wet infrastructure, today announced the worldwide release of the SurgeAnimatemodule for its industry-leading surge product line. The breakthrough pipe profile animation module brings a new level of visualization and interpretation power to transient analysis, helping engineers quickly gain a thorough understanding of the complex phenomena occurring within their distribution systems.

Available for InfoSurge and InfoWorks TS, the module is ideal for assessing the strength and effectiveness of water supply and distribution systems under a wide range of hydraulic transient conditions, from routine operation to emergency states. It has unprecedented power to help users confidently determine the best combination of surge protection devices to minimize the impact of objectionable pressure transients. The enhanced product suite reflects Innovyze’s vanguard position in the water industry and its continuing commitment to delivering pioneering technology for improving the safety and reliability of the world’s water supply.

“This key new modeling functionality makes it easy to get a handle on how transient waves propagate over time in distribution systems, allowing water utilities worldwide to better see how transient events are mitigated by surge protection devices,” noted Christopher W. Baxter, Ph.D., President of HYDRANNT Consulting Inc., in Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada. “Innovyze continues to raise the standard in the industry.”

Anticipating and controlling transient response is critical to ensuring the protection, integrity, and effective/efficient operation of water distribution systems. Transient responses can introduce pressures of sufficient magnitude (upsurge) to burst pipes and damage equipment. The resulting repercussions can range from extended service outages to loss of property and life. Transient responses can also produce sub-atmospheric pressures (downsurge) that can force contaminated groundwater into the distribution system at a leaky joint, crack or break, leading to grave health consequences when carried out downstream in the pipe system. Sustained sub-atmospheric pressures may also lead to cavitation and water column separation, resulting in severe “water hammer” effects as the vapor cavity collapses.

The Innovyze transient flow simulation technology suite addresses every facet of pressure surge analysis and its role in utility infrastructure management and protection, delivering the highest rate of return in the industry. It provides the engineer-friendly simulation framework water utilities need to identify characteristics that can make their water supply and distribution systems more susceptible to transient pressure events. Users can quickly and efficiently assess the effects of power outages, pump shutdowns and startups, valve closures, rapid demand and pump speed changes, as well as the efficacy of any combination of surge protection devices. The product suite also accurately simulates cavitation and water column separation and evaluates their intensity. Its blazing simulation speed, unrivalled in the industry, makes transient analysis an easier and more enjoyable task.

The new SurgeAnimate module enables users to create live animations of pipe profiles simply by specifying the first and last nodes; the rest is done automatically. Tank and reservoir levels, pump speeds, water flow or velocity rates are all animated. Many surge devices (such as air valves and bladder tanks) are also animated in detail. Animation speed can be set and stopped or restarted interactively at any simulation time period, allowing the user to thoroughly view and analyze the model’s transient activities (including cavitation pressure). Animations can be saved as AVI files.

Armed with these mission-critical network modeling capabilities, water utilities can more accurately assess their susceptibility to low or negative pressures caused by transient surges, identify vulnerable areas and risks, evaluate and design sound control and mitigation measures, and determine improved operational plans and security upgrades.

“The ability to confidently assess distribution system vulnerability to pressure transients is becoming more critical every day,” said Innovyze President and Chief Operating Officer Paul F. Boulos, Ph.D., BCEEM, Hon.D.WRE, F. ASCE. “Our new SurgeAnimate module makes models come alive, allowing users to go inside the pipes and network elements for the first time. This unprecedented ability to see and experience model transient activities in real time is critical to designing reliable, enduring systems and protecting public health.”

January 16, 2012
Surcharged Node and the Link Connection in SWMM 5

Image001

Subject:   Surcharged Node and the Link Connection in SWMM 5

 

A surcharged node in SWMM 5 uses this point iteration equation (Figure 1):

 

dY/dt = dQ / The sum of the Connecting Link values of  dQ/dH

 

where Y is the depth in the node, dt is the time step, H is the head across the link (downstream – upstream), dQ is the net inflow into the node and dQ/dH is the derivative with respect to H of the link  St Venant equation.  If you are trying to calibrate the surcharged node depth, the main calibration variables are the time step and the link  roughness:

 

1.   Mannings’s N

2.   Hazen-Williams or

3.   Darcy-Weisbach

 

The link roughness is part of the term dq1 in the St Venant solution and the other loss terms are included in the term dq5.  You can adjust the roughness of the surcharged link  to affect the node surcharge depth.

 

Figure 1.  The Node Surcharge Equation is a function of the net inflow and the sum of the term dQ/dH in all connecting links. Generally, as you increase the roughness the value of dQ/dH increases and the denominator of the term dY/dt = dQ/dQdH increases.

 

Image002

 

Figure 2.  The value of dQ/dH in a link as the roughness of the link increases.

Image006

January 16, 2012
Surcharged Node and the Link Connection in SWMM 5

Image001

Subject:   Surcharged Node and the Link Connection in SWMM 5

 

A surcharged node in SWMM 5 uses this point iteration equation (Figure 1):

 

dY/dt = dQ / The sum of the Connecting Link values of  dQ/dH

 

where Y is the depth in the node, dt is the time step, H is the head across the link (downstream – upstream), dQ is the net inflow into the node and dQ/dH is the derivative with respect to H of the link  St Venant equation.  If you are trying to calibrate the surcharged node depth, the main calibration variables are the time step and the link  roughness:

 

1.   Mannings’s N

2.   Hazen-Williams or

3.   Darcy-Weisbach

 

The link roughness is part of the term dq1 in the St Venant solution and the other loss terms are included in the term dq5.  You can adjust the roughness of the surcharged link  to affect the node surcharge depth.

 

Figure 1.  The Node Surcharge Equation is a function of the net inflow and the sum of the term dQ/dH in all connecting links. Generally, as you increase the roughness the value of dQ/dH increases and the denominator of the term dY/dt = dQ/dQdH increases.

 

Image002

 

Figure 2.  The value of dQ/dH in a link as the roughness of the link increases.

Image006

January 15, 2012
HOW MOSQUITOES FLY IN RAIN from 3Quarks

HOW MOSQUITOES FLY IN RAIN

Mariel Emrich in Talking Science:

ScreenHunter_05 Jan. 14 21.42Mosquitoes are as adept at flying in rainstorms as under clear skies. But how is that possible? Wouldn’t rain crush a mosquito to the ground since mosquitoes weigh 50 times less than raindrops?

David Hu, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering and biology at the Georgia Institute of Technology, and his graduate research assistantAndrew Dickerson have found that while mosquitoes do get hit by raindrops, they don’t get crushed by them.

Hu discussed their research in a talk at November’s APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meetingthat was entitled “How Mosquitoes Fly in the Rain”.

The researchers measured the impact forces of raindrops on both regular mosquitoes and custom-built mosquito mimics. The mimics were made from small Styrofoam spheres of mosquito-like size and mass. They used high-speed video to capture images of the mosquitoes getting hit with raindrops.

Since the bugs fly so slowly (a maximum of 1 meter per second) compared to the drops (which fall between 5 to 9 meters per second), the mosquitoes cannot react quickly enough for avoidance, and most likely cannot sense the imminent collision.

More here.

Posted by Abbas Raza at 03:42 PM | Permalink 

January 15, 2012
How to Make Icons and Expand the Toolbars in infoSWMM and InfoSewer

Image001

Subject:  How to Make Icons and Expand the Toolbars in InfoSWMM and InfoSewer

 

You can customize the toolbars in InfoSWMM and InfoSewer by clicking on Customize and performing 4 steps:

 

Step 1.  Click on Customize

Step 2.  Move the tool from the Command list to the toolbar.

Step 3.  Change the Button Image for the Default Style.

Step 4.  The Toolbar now has a new Icon for the InfoSWMM command.

 

Step 1.  Click on Customize

 

Image002

 

Step 2.  Move the tool from the Command list to the toolbar.

 

Image003

 

Step 3.  Change the Button Image for the Default Style.

Image004

 

Step 4.  The Toolbar now has a new Icon for the InfoSWMM command.

Image005

January 15, 2012
How do I correct a fatal error resulting in automatic shutdown in ArcMap?

Image001

Subject:   How do I correct a fatal error resulting in automatic shutdown in ArcMap?

 

If you cannot open ArcMap, InfoSewer or InfoSWMM at all and get a fatal Esri error the problem may be the file normal.mxt

 

“If the startup file in ArcGIS Desktop or component applications (e.g., ArcMap, ArcGlobe, ArcScene) is corrupt, a fatal error can occur. Renaming or deleting the existing startup file will often resolve the error. Once the corrupted startup file is removed, ArcGIS will create a new startup file after the application is launched (http://kb.iu.edu/data/asuv.html).”

 

 

To remove the startup file in Windows XP for Arc GIS 10 go to the directory C:\Documents and Settings\Your Name\Application Data\ESRI\Desktop10.0\ArcMap\Templates and delete the file Normal.mxt.   You then reopen Arc Map and the normal.mxt file will be recreated and smaller.  You will have to reset the ArcMap toolbars to better control InfoSewer and InfoSWMM.   

 

 

Image002

January 15, 2012
How do I correct a fatal error resulting in automatic shutdown in ArcMap?

Image001

Subject:   How do I correct a fatal error resulting in automatic shutdown in ArcMap?

 

If you cannot open ArcMap, InfoSewer or InfoSWMM at all and get a fatal Esri error the problem may be the file normal.mxt

 

“If the startup file in ArcGIS Desktop or component applications (e.g., ArcMap, ArcGlobe, ArcScene) is corrupt, a fatal error can occur. Renaming or deleting the existing startup file will often resolve the error. Once the corrupted startup file is removed, ArcGIS will create a new startup file after the application is launched (http://kb.iu.edu/data/asuv.html).”

 

 

To remove the startup file in Windows XP for Arc GIS 10 go to the directory C:\Documents and Settings\Your Name\Application Data\ESRI\Desktop10.0\ArcMap\Templates and delete the file Normal.mxt.   You then reopen Arc Map and the normal.mxt file will be recreated and smaller.  You will have to reset the ArcMap toolbars to better control InfoSewer and InfoSWMM.   

 

 

Image002

January 13, 2012
SWMM 5 Engine Updates between v13 and v22 by Category

Subject:  SWMM 5 Engine Updates between v13 and v22 by Category

 

The complete list of engine and GUI changes can be found in this text file on the EPA Site http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/wq/models/swmm/epaswmm5_updates.txt

 

This note  categorizes the engine changes by aggregating dynamic wave solution changes, surface ponding changes, RDII and Hydrology for example.  The number preceding each change is the change number per engine update – the version of the engine update is shown at the end of each change paragraph.  The Categories are General Changes, Dynamic Wave Changes, RDII Changes, Infiltration and Surface Runoff Changes, Climate Data Changes, Rainfall  Changes, LID Changes and Water Quality Changes.

 

 

General Changes

 

6.  The maximum trials used when evaluating the flow and head equations at

    a given time period for dynamic wave routing was increased from 4 to 8.

    See dynwave.c.   Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

28. For models that only compute runoff and have a reporting time step

    less than the wet time step, the latter is internally set equal to

    the former. See swmm5.c.  Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

1.  Reporting of the total infiltration + evaporation loss for each

    Storage Unit (as a percent of total inflow to the unit) was added

    to the Storage Volume Summary table in the Status Report. See

    objects.h, node.c, stats.c, and statsrpt.c.   Build 5.0.018 (11/18/09)

2.  Double counting the final stored volume when finding the nodes with

    the highest mass balance errors has been eliminated. See stats.c.

    Build 5.0.018 (11/18/09)

4.  Hot Start interface files now contain the final state of each

    subcatchment’s groundwater zone in addition to the node and

    link information they have always had. See routing.c.  Build 5.0.018 (11/18/09)

5.  To avoid confusion, the actual conduit slope is now listed in the

    Link Summary table of the Status Report rather than the adjusted

    slope that results from any conduit lengthening. See link.c and

    dynwave.c. Build 5.0.018 (11/18/09)

6.  The Status Report now displays only those summary tables for

    which results have been obtained (e.g., if the Flow Routing

    option is turned off, then no node or link tables are displayed).

    See massbal.c and statsrpt.c. Build 5.0.018 (11/18/09)

7.  Some code re-factoring was done to place rain gage validation

    and initialization in separate functions. See project.c, gage.c,

    and funcs.h. Build 5.0.018 (11/18/09)

8.  The engine version number was updated to 50018 (this update had

    been overlooked since release 5.0.010). See consts.h. Build 5.0.018 (11/18/09)

2.  Error 112 (a conduit’s elevation drop exceeds its length)

    is now treated as a Warning condition and not a fatal error.

    In this case the conduit’s slope is computed as in earlier

    versions of SWMM (elevation drop / length) instead of using

    the more rigorous right-triangle method of HEC-RAS. See

    link.c and text.h. Build 5.0.017 (10/7/09)

3.  Inflow interface files no longer have to contain data for

    all of the same pollutants defined in the current project

    (e.g., they can contain just flows or some subset of the

    pollutants). See iface.c. Build 5.0.017 (10/7/09)

5.  The 2 GB binary output file size limit for runs made under the GUI

    that was inadvertently added into release 5.0.014 was removed

    (see output.c).   Build 5.0.015 (4/10/09)

Binary Output File (output.c)

41.  The Report Start Time written to the binary results is now

     adjusted to be be one reporting period prior to when the first

     result is reported so that the GUI uses the correct date when it

     displays results.   Build 5.0.014 (1/21/09)

Simulation Options

37.  A user can now choose to ignore any combination of the following

     process models when running a simulation: Rainfall/Runoff, Snowmelt,

     Groundwater, Flow Routing and Water Quality (swmm5.c, project.c,

     runoff.c, subcatch.c, routing.c, keywords.c, keywords.h, text.h,

     and globals.h). Build 5.0.014 (1/21/09)

Status Report (statsrpt.c)

38.  The heading for the maximum flow column in the Link Flow Summary table

     was changed to “|Flow|” to show that the flows listed are absolute

     values. Build 5.0.014 (1/21/09)

39.  The labels “Mgal” and “Mltrs” were replaced with “10^6 gal” and

     “10^6 ltr”, respectively. Build 5.0.014 (1/21/09)

40.  The widths for the various types of flow volume fields (e.g., runoff

     volume, node inflow volume, etc.) were increased in size. Build 5.0.014 (1/21/09)

Output Report (command line version) (report.c)

42.  Time series tables for reported subcatchments now report Snow Depth,

     Groundwater Elevation, and Groundwater Flow (provided that snowmelt

     and groundwater processes are included in the simulation). Build 5.0.014 (1/21/09)

 

 

RDII Changes

 

 

4.  Instead of using the rain gage’s recording interval as the

    time step for processing a set of RDII unit hydrographs, the

    smaller of the wet runoff time step and the time to peak of

    the shortest unit hydrograph in the set is now used. As a

    result, it is now permissible to use hydrographs whose time

    to peak is shorter than the rain gage recording interval.

    See rdii.c.  Build 5.0.017 (10/7/09)

8.  A bug created in release 5.0.015 that caused incorrect RDII inflows

    to be computed when the rain gage recording interval was less than

    the runoff wet time step has been fixed. (See rdii.c).  Build 5.0.016 (6/22/09)

9.  A new error check was added to detect if the time base of an RDII

    unit hydrograph is less than its rain gage recording interval.

    (See rdii.c).   Build 5.0.016 (6/22/09)

2.  Different sets of Initial Abstraction parameters (maximum depth,

    initial depth, and recovery rate) can now be specified for each

    of the three unit hydrographs (short term, medium term, and long

    term) that comprise an RDII Unit Hydrograph group (see keywords.h,

    keywords.c, objects.h, rdii.c, and text.h).  Build 5.0.015 (4/10/09)

35.  A problem with no RDII being produced when two or more RDII unit

     hydrographs utilized the same rain gage was fixed. Build 5.0.014 (1/21/09)

Time Series (table.c, error.c, error.h, objects.h)

36.  Time Series data can now be imported from an external file instead

     of having to be listed in the project’s input file. See the Users

     Manual or the Help file for details.  Build 5.0.014 (1/21/09)

 

Dynamic Wave Solution Changes

 

9.  A divide by zero error no longer occurs when computing the

    hydraulic radius of an empty Filled Circular pipe whose filled

    depth is zero. A similar error for the hydraulic radius of an

    empty trapezoidal channel whose bottom width was zero was also

    eliminated. See xsect.c.  Build 5.0.022 (04/21/11)

10. The critical or normal depth adjustment made for a conduit is

    no longer allowed to set the depth to zero — some small depth

    level is always maintained. See dynwave.c. Build 5.0.022 (04/21/11))

11. The Pump Summary Report was expanded to include number of start-

    ups, minimum flow, and time off both the low and high ends of

    the pump curve. See objects.h, link.c, stats.c, and statsrpt.c. Build 5.0.022 (04/21/11)

12. When the setting of an orifice or weir was changed to 0 (to

    completely block flow) the flow depth in the element wasn’t

    being set to 0. This was only a reporting error and had no

    effect on the flow routing calculations. See link.c.  Build 5.0.022 (04/21/11)

13. The Node Surcharge Summary in the Status Report did not report

    a ponded node as being surcharged. This was only a reporting

    error and had no effect on the flow routing calculations. See

    stats.c.   Build 5.0.022 (04/21/11)

5.  The check to see if flow in a link should not exceed the normal flow

    now uses just the upstream Froude number rather than both up and

    downstream numbers. See dynwave.c.  Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

6.  The maximum trials used when evaluating the flow and head equations at

    a given time period for dynamic wave routing was increased from 4 to 8.

    See dynwave.c.   Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

7.  The Ponding calculation for dynamic wave flow routing was changed once

    again to obtain better continuity results. The depth in a surcharged

    node that can pond is not allowed to rise higher than just beyond full

    depth in any single time step. After that, its change in depth is

    determined by the node’s ponded area. Similarly, the depth of a ponded

    node is not allowed to drop more than just below full depth in any

    single time step. See dynwave.c and node.c.  Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

8.  For Kinematic Wave and Steady Flow routing, a node’s ponded area is

    no longer used to infer a ponded depth when a node floods with Ponding

    turned on. Instead, the water depth is simply set to the node’s maximum

    depth and the ponded area parameter is simply used as a indicator as

    to whether the node can pond or not. (This differs from dynamic wave

    routing where the ponded area directly influences ponded depth through

    the solution of the momentum and flow conservation equations.) See

    flowrout.c.  Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

9.  As a consequence of the preceeding update, the Node Flooding Summary

    table in the Status Report no longer displays the maximum ponded volume

    in acre-inches (or hectare-mm). Instead it displays the maximum ponded

    depth (ft or m) for Dynamic Wave flow routing or the maximum ponded

    volume (1000 ft3 or 1000 m3) for other forms of routing. See stats.c

    and statsrpt.c.  Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

11. Controls based on flow rates now properly account for the direction of

    flow when they are evaluated. This may require users to add an extra

    condition clause to a rule that only applies for flow in the positive

    direction (e.g., AND Link XXX FLOW >= 0.0). See controls.c. Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

12. The Villemonte correction for downstream submergence is now also used

    for partly filled orifices (instead of just for weirs). See link.c and

    dynwave.c. Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

13. A missing term in the equation used to check for submerged inlet

    control for Culvert conduits was fixed. See culvert.c. Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

14. If a non-conduit link is connected to a storage node then its

    contribution to the node’s surface area is now ignored. See

    dynwave.c. Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

15. The automatic adjustment of the maximum depth of a link’s end nodes

    to be at least as high as the link’s crown no longer applies when

    the link is a bottom orifice. See link.c. Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

16. A fatal error message is now generated if a conduit’s entrance,

    exit, or average loss coefficient value is negative. See link.c.

    Build 5.0.019 (07/30/10)

1.  The Ponding routine for dynamic wave flow routing was once

    again modified, this time to account for the special case

    where a node transitions between surcharged and ponded

    conditions within a single time step. This should correct

    the large continuity errors experienced with ponding under

    release 5.0.016. See dynwave.c.   Build 5.0.017 (10/7/09)

2.  When the Ponding option is turned on, nodes that can pond are no

    longer always treated like storage nodes that never surcharge.

    Now they are only treated this way after ponding occurs. Otherwise

    they behave like a normal node. (See dynwave.c).  Build 5.0.016 (6/22/09)  

3.  The small tolerance used to decide when a storage node was full or

    not has been removed since for very small time steps it could cause

    a currently full storage unit to remain full even if there was some

    small net outflow from it. (See node.c). Build 5.0.016 (6/22/09)

4.  Spurious warnings for negative elevation offsets no longer appear

    when the “*” entry is used for the offset value or when the offset

    elevation value is within a small tolerance of the node invert

    elevation. (See link.c). Build 5.0.016 (6/22/09)

5.  When the water level at a storage node exceeds the highest level

    supplied in its Storage Curve, an extrapolated surface area from

    the curve is now used only if the curve is sloping outward (i.e.,

    surface area is increasing with depth at the top of the curve). If

    instead it slopes inward then the last surface area entry in the

    curve is used. (See table.c).   Build 5.0.016 (6/22/09)

3.  A Meander Modifier was added to a Transect’s parameters. It is the

    ratio of the length of a meandering main channel to the length of

    the overbank area that surrounds it. This modifier is applied to

    all conduits that use this particular transect for their cross

    section. It assumes that the length supplied for these conduits is

    that of the longer main channel. SWMM will use the shorter overbank

    length in its calculations while internally increasing the main

    channel roughness to account for its longer length. (See dynwave.c,

    flowrout.c, link.c, objects.h, and transect.c).  Build 5.0.015 (4/10/09)

6.  Any backflow that flows into an outfall node due to the head

    condition at the node is now correctly reported as part of the

    node’s Total Inflow result (see node.c).   Build 5.0.015 (4/10/09)

8.  The normal flow limitation for dynamic wave flow routing based on

    the Froude number now requires that the latter be greater or equal

    to 1.0 for both the upstream and downstream flow depths rather just

    for either of these (see dynwave.c).  Build 5.0.015 (4/10/09)

9.  A reporting error for the overflow rate into the ponded volume for

    a node that floods under dynamic wave flow routing was corrected

    (see dynwave.c).   Build 5.0.015 (4/10/09)

10. The practice of not allowing a computed top surface width to be less

    than the width at 4% of the full conduit depth for dynamic wave flow

    routing has been dropped in favor of using the actual width, no matter

    how small (see dynwave.c).   Build 5.0.015 (4/10/09)

Flow Routing (flowrout.c, node.c, inflow.c, link.c, and objects.h)

6.   A new Minimum Slope option has been added. When this option is non-

     zero a computed conduit slope is not allowed to be below this value.

     The default is 0. (Note: the slope of a conduit whose elevation

     difference is below 0.001 ft is first computed using this elevation

     difference and then is compared to the Minimum Slope value.) (The

     following files were also changed for this feature: keywords.c,

     project.c, enums.h,

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »